INS Mahe and the New Maritime Frontline: Why India’s Littoral Waters Are Becoming the Real Battleground

When the Indian Navy commissioned INS Mahe, the first vessel in a new class of shallow-water anti-submarine warfare boats, it did not instantly generate the excitement that accompanies larger ships or submarines. There were no sweeping declarations about naval dominance, no dramatic platform unveilings, no claims of shifting oceanic balance. Yet its commissioning reflects a far more consequential transformation in India’s maritime posture. Mahe signals India’s recognition that the next phase of maritime competition will unfold not across the vast expanse of the Indian Ocean, but in the narrow, congested, infrastructure-dense waters directly off its coast. These littoral spaces, stretching only a few dozen nautical miles from shore are fast becoming one of the most strategically contested environments in contemporary geopolitics. 

The Littoral as India’s Strategic Centre of Gravity

For decades, the Indian Navy, like most modern navies, framed its strategic identity around blue-water capability, carrier groups, long-endurance destroyers, nuclear submarines, and extended sea control. This made sense in an era when threats were concentrated in deep water and geopolitical competition revolved around freedom of navigation, chokepoints, and regional presence. But over the last fifteen years, the strategic map has shifted. Littoral waters, those within roughly a hundred kilometres from the coastline have become the most valuable maritime space for economic, digital, and national security.

The reason is simple: the density of critical infrastructure in this narrow coastal belt is unparalleled. India’s busiest commercial ports all lie on the littoral. Offshore platforms in the Arabian Sea provide a major share of domestic crude production. The western coastline hosts the heaviest concentration of petrochemical refineries in the country. Almost all of India’s undersea fibre-optic cables—responsible for carrying its financial traffic, energy transactions, defence communications, and digital flows—make landfall in shallow waters near Mumbai, Chennai, and Kochi. Even minor disruption to these cables can generate outsized national consequences, as seen globally when near-shore cables were damaged in Vietnam (2007), Egypt (2008), and more recently during the Red Sea disruptions linked to Houthis and suspected third-party interference.

The Indian littoral is therefore both a strategic prize and a strategic vulnerability. And it is precisely this vulnerability that foreign powers have begun to study, probe, and quietly exploit.

The Rise of Undersea Competition in India’s Near Waters

The operational environment beneath the Indian Ocean has evolved dramatically in recent years, shaped largely by the behaviour of extra-regional powers. Chinese submarine deployments in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) have tripled over the past decade. What was once an occasional presence has now become predictable, recurrent, and increasingly diverse, ranging from attack submarines to ballistic missile submarines and oceanographic platforms. China’s “research” vessels, including the Xiang Yang Hong class and the Shiyan series, routinely approach India’s Exclusive Economic Zone, often switching off Automated Identification System (AIS) transponders for prolonged periods before conducting extended survey missions. These surveys are not benign scientific exercises; they generate high-resolution seabed maps that can later support military operations. Accurate seabed profiles help submarines identify quiet ingress routes, allow unmanned underwater vehicles to navigate more effectively, and assist reconnaissance missions targeting coastal cables or offshore infrastructure.

Pakistan’s underwater modernisation adds another layer to this emerging landscape. Its acquisition of eight Hangor-class submarines from China, several tailored for shallow-water operations, significantly expands its capacity to operate near India’s coastline. Alongside this, Pakistan is developing midget submarines and unmanned systems, platforms that are inherently difficult to detect but capable of approaching high-value targets. The combination of Chinese survey activity and Pakistani shallow-water capability creates a new strategic reality: India’s coastal waters, long treated as safe by virtue of proximity, are now among the most contested in the region.

Compounding the challenge is the rapid proliferation of autonomous undersea systems. Modern UUVs (Unmanned Underwater Vehicles) can travel hundreds of kilometres, map seabed cables, or linger near offshore installations without any human operator on board. These platforms are small, silent, and extremely difficult to track, especially in environments where sonar performance is degraded by sediment, temperature inversion layers, high shipping density, and acoustic clutter. Many of these characteristics define India’s west coast precisely.

INS Mahe as a Strategic Response to a New Threat Landscape

It is against this backdrop that INS Mahe acquires its significance. Shallow-water anti-submarine warfare is exceptionally demanding. Unlike deep water, where signals behave predictably and sonar has reach, the littoral is chaotic. Sound bounces off the seabed unpredictably. Salinity and temperature layers distort acoustic returns. Fishing vessels, commercial cargo ships, coastal construction, and natural background noise create an overwhelming acoustic environment in which small hostile platforms can blend almost seamlessly.

Large warships, frigates, destroyers, even submarines struggle in these conditions because they were designed for open-ocean missions. INS Mahe, however, is engineered specifically for this complexity. Its size, manoeuvrability, and low acoustic footprint allow it to operate in shallow environments where surveillance is most difficult yet most essential. It is capable of tracking, deterring, or neutralising the very platforms, midget submarines, UUVs, survey vessels that are redefining undersea competition in the IOR.

More importantly, Mahe represents a conceptual shift within Indian naval strategy. It signals movement away from a singular focus on blue-water dominance toward a more layered understanding of maritime security, one in which littoral denial, infrastructure protection, and undersea domain awareness are treated as core missions rather than secondary ones. As undersea threats become more covert, persistent, and technologically sophisticated, India’s ability to detect and respond within its near waters will determine its maritime resilience.

The Global Pivot Toward Littoral Warfare

India is not alone in grappling with these challenges. Across the world, major navies are reorienting toward littoral spaces as the new frontier of strategic competition. The U.S. Navy has invested heavily in littoral combat ships and long-endurance undersea surveillance systems. Japan, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and Australia are developing platforms that emphasise shallow-water ASW, seabed monitoring, and counter-UUV operations. The increasing frequency of cable disruptions, ranging from the Baltic Sea to the South China Sea has pushed littoral security to the centre of national security thinking. In effect, we are witnessing the emergence of a new maritime order in which policing the seabed, protecting near-shore digital infrastructure, and countering autonomous systems are as important as traditional naval firepower.

India’s geography amplifies the urgency of this global shift. With over 7,500 kilometres of coastline, vital naval bases on both coasts, heavy energy infrastructure offshore, and submarine cables that form the backbone of its digital economy, India cannot afford a reactive posture. Littoral security is not a niche concern, it is a foundational requirement for national stability.

Redefining India’s Maritime Imperatives

INS Mahe serves as both a capability addition and a strategic message. It underscores India’s recognition that maritime security begins at home, that the coastline is no longer a peripheral zone but the first line of contact with adversarial activity. As China expands its submarine logistics chain through Pakistan and Sri Lanka, and as autonomous platforms become cheaper, quieter, and more capable, India’s coastal waters will be where the earliest signs of pressure manifest.

This realisation demands a new model of maritime preparedness. India will need a deeper undersea domain awareness grid that integrates seabed sensors, coastal radar chains, autonomous gliders, and naval aviation assets. Offshore infrastructure, cables, pipelines, refinery loading points will require hardening and real-time surveillance. Naval doctrine will need to reflect the reality that future crises may begin not with dramatic warships on the horizon but with the silent disappearance of a sensor node, an unexplained disruption to a cable, or the detection of a UUV near a port approach.

INS Mahe cannot address all these challenges, but it is the first step toward a more realistic, littoral-centric maritime architecture. It embodies a shift from platform-centric thinking to environment-centric readiness, acknowledging that India must defend the spaces where its vulnerabilities are greatest and adversarial advantage is easiest to exploit.

A Strategic Inflection Point for India’s Navy

Viewed in isolation, INS Mahe is a small vessel. But viewed in context, it represents one of the most important doctrinal shifts in India’s naval strategy in a generation. It symbolises a recognition that geopolitical competition in the Indian Ocean is no longer defined solely by distant deployments or blue-water manoeuvres. It is increasingly defined by proximity, by what happens just beyond the coastline, in waters where hostile platforms can move quietly, where infrastructure is exposed, and where attribution is difficult.

India’s future maritime influence will depend on how effectively it secures this space. Littoral waters are becoming the new battleground because they concentrate the assets that make the modern Indian economy function. They are where foreign powers are probing most aggressively, using increasingly sophisticated undersea tools. And they are where India must now build deterrence, resilience, and awareness.

In this sense, INS Mahe is not merely a ship. It is a strategic acknowledgement of a changing maritime era, one where competition unfolds below the surface, beyond public view, and closer to home than ever before. It is a statement that India understands this shift and is preparing for a future in which coastal vigilance and undersea domain awareness are as critical as blue-water strength. The commissioning of Mahe marks the beginning of a new maritime chapter for India, one rooted in realism, deterrence, and the hard logic of the world’s most contested waters. 

References

1. UNCTAD. (2024). Review of Maritime Transport 2024.
2. International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC). (2024). Global Submarine Cable Data Summary.
3. U.S. Department of Defense. (2024). China Military Power Report 2024.
4. International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). (2024). The Military Balance 2024.
5. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2024). SIPRI Yearbook 2024: Military Expenditure and Naval Trends.
6. National Maritime Foundation (NMF). (2022–2024). Issue Briefs on Chinese Oceanographic and Survey Vessels.
7. Indian Navy. (2023). Ensuring Secure Seas: Indian Maritime Security Strategy.
8. Indian Navy. (2024). Indian Maritime Doctrine.
9. Pakistan Ministry of Defence. (2023–2024). Pakistan Navy Modernisation Releases.
10. RAND Corporation. (2023). Undersea Autonomy and Emerging Naval Risks.
11. Indian Navy. (2025). INS Mahe commission statement and shallow-water ASW capability overview.
12. Economic Survey of India. (Various years). Port infrastructure, energy sector, and coastal infrastructure datasets.
13. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2024). Submarine Cable Landing Station Information Sheets.
14. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India. (2024). Offshore Production and Refining Capacity Statistics.
15. AIS Marine Traffic & Maritime Tracker Data (compiled 2019–2024).